Revitalising Empirical Research in Education with Citizen Science: From (Solving) Misinterpretations to (Embracing) Opportunities


  • Luca Ghirotto Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia



Citizen Science, Empirical Research, Educational Research, Statistics, Statactivism


Empirical research in education needs to be revitalised. However, there are some misunderstandings to solve: I) experts must refrain from expropriating the teachers from any possibility of voicing about scientific research that matters; II) considering scientific evidence as incontrovertible fact is erroneous; III) believing that the only research worth being conducted at school is that that delivers certainty and political/ethical impartiality is the last misconception. A couple of obstacles to counter these misunderstandings subsists: I) the teacher training, which does not equip teachers to comprehend and conduct scientific research; II) the practices of accountability of scientific production in academic institutions pushing researchers to publish low-quality/interest studies. In this context, Citizen Science (involvement of non-researchers in interactions with researchers as equals) can be a promising resolving direction.


Allen, P. J., & Baughman, F. D. (2016). Active learning in research methods classes is associated with higher knowledge and confidence, though not evaluations or satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. Retrieved from

Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35–54.

Appadurai, A. (2014). Il futuro come fatto culturale. Saggio sulla condizione globale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

Baard, P., & Sandin, P. (2022). Principlism and citizen science: The possibilities and limitations of principlism for guiding responsible citizen science conduct. Research Ethics, 18(4), 304–318.

Barbagli, M., & Dei, M. (1969). Le vestali della classe media. Ricerca sociologica sugli insegnanti. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Bertolini, P. (2021). L’esistere pedagogico. Ragioni e limiti di una pedagogia come scienza fenomenologicamente fondata. Tarozzi, M. (Ed.). Milano: Edizioni Angelo Guerini e Associati.

Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.

Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability(Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 33–46.

Borghi, V., & Giullari, B. (2015). Trasformazioni delle basi informative e immaginazione sociologica. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, (3–4), 379–404.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (Vol. 16). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1971). I delfini. Gli studenti e la cultura. Bologna: Guaraldi Editore.

Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137.

Bromme, R., Mede, N. G., Thomm, E., Kremer, B., & Ziegler, R. (2022). An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0262823.

Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Vitale, T. (2014). Statactivism: Forms of action between disclosure and affirmation. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 7(2), 198–220.

Desrosières, A. (2011). Buono o cattivo? Il ruolo del numero nella città neoliberale. 52(3), 373–398.

Eagleman, D. M. (2013). Why public dissemination of science matters: A Manifesto. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(30), 12147.

Eitzel, M. V., Cappadonna, J. L., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R. E., Virapongse, A., West, S. E., … Jiang, Q. (2017). Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 1.

Froehlich, D. E., Hobusch, U., & Moeslinger, K. (2021). Research methods in teacher education: meaningful engagement through service-learning. Frontiers in Education, 6. Retrieved from

Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice (pp. 105–122). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning. London, England: Routledge.

Hess, D. J. (2007). Alternative Pathways in Science and Technology: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hess, D. J. (2009). The potentials and limitations of civil society research: Getting undone science done. Sociological Inquiry, 79(3), 306–327. SocINDEX with Full Text. Retrieved from SocINDEX with Full Text.

Horta, H., & Li, H. (2022). Nothing but publishing: The overriding goal of PhD students in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau. Studies in Higher Education, 1–20.

Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology an Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Inglehart, R. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991–1017. Cambridge Core.

Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lee, I. (2014). Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing. Language Teaching, 47(2), 250–261. Cambridge Core.

Lee, Y. J., Arida, J. A., & Donovan, H. S. (2017). The application of crowdsourcing approaches to cancer research: A systematic review. Cancer Medicine, 6(11), 2595–2605.

Meister Broekema, P., Horlings, L. G., & Bulder, E. (2022). Tackling societal challenges together: Co-creation strategies and social innovation in EU policy and funded projects. European Policy Analysis, 8(1), 68–86.

Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., Lewenstein, B. V., & Bonney, R. (2019). Engagement in science through citizen science: Moving beyond data collection. Science Education, 103(3), 665–690.

Piketty, T. (2014). Il capitale nel XXI secolo. Milano: Bompiani.

Rasmussen, L. M. (2019). When citizens do science: Stories from labs, garages, and beyond. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 9(1), 1–4.

Roche, J., Bell, L., Galvão, C., Golumbic, Y. N., Kloetzer, L., Knoben, N., … Winter, S. (2020). Citizen science, education, and learning: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Sociology, 5. Retrieved from

Sulik, J., Deroy, O., Dezecache, G., Newson, M., Zhao, Y., El Zein, M., & Tunçgenç, B. (2021). Facing the pandemic with trust in science. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 301.

Tarozzi, M. (2021). Introduzione. Attualità de l’Esistere pedagogico. In P. Bertolini, L’esistere pedagogico. Ragioni e limiti di una pedagogia come scienza fenomenologicamente fondata (pp. 15–31). Milano: Edizioni Angelo Guerini e Associati.

Turner, R., Sutton, C., Gray, C., Stevens, S., & Swain, J. (2018). Student experiences of research methods education in college-based higher education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 23(3), 348–367.

Vaughan, Lisa. M., & Farrah, J. (2020). Participatory research methods – Choice points in the research process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1), 1–13.

Wiggins, A., & Wilbanks, J. (2019). The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), 3–14.

Yokoyama, H. M., & Ikkatai, Y. (2022). Support and trust in the government and COVID-19 experts during the pandemic. Frontiers in Communication, 7. Retrieved from

Zeuli, J. S. (1994). How do teachers understand research when they read it? Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 39–55.




How to Cite

Ghirotto, L. (2023). Revitalising Empirical Research in Education with Citizen Science: From (Solving) Misinterpretations to (Embracing) Opportunities. Encyclopaideia, 27(1S), 45–53.