Focus Group Discussion: how many Participants in a Group?

Michela Cortini, Teresa Galanti, Stefania Fantinelli

Abstract


Focus group technique is often described as a subaltern procedure for collecting and analysing data, underestimating the FG great value; today this method has such a big scientific reputation that it is widely applied in different social research areas such as marketing, education, communication. This theoretical study aims at deeply analyze the matter about the right number of participants for a focus group; this methodological consideration can provide useful elements in order to balance risks and benefits when planning qualitative research in social context. In addition to the numerosity matter there are some elements to carefully consider for an effective focus group research: the sensitivity of themes, the scope of the research, the recording setting, the social category of both participants and researcher, the client.

Keywords


Focus group; Numerosity; Qualitative; Technique; Participants

References


Abrams, K. M., Wang, Z., Song, Y. J., & Galindo-Gonzalez, S. (2014). Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups. Social Science Computer Review, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313519733.

Arksey, H. (1996). Collecting data through joint interviews. Retrieved November 12, 2018 from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU15.html.

Bakeman, R., & Beck, S. (1974). The size of informal groups in public. Environment and Behavior, 6(3), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657400600305.

Baker, R., & Hinton, R. (1999). Do Focus Groups Facilitate Meaningful Participation in Social Research? In Barbour, R. S. & Jenny, K. (eds.) Developing Focus Group Research, London: Sage.

Barbour, R. S., Kitzinger, J., (eds.) (1999). Developing focus group research. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857.

Basch, C. E. (1987). Focus group interview: An underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education & Behavior, 14(4), 411–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818701400404.

Bouchard, T. J. Jr., Barsaloux, J., & Drauden, G. (1974). Brainstorming procedure, group size, and sex as determinants of the problem-solving effectiveness of groups and individuals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(2), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036450.

Bouchard, T. J., Jr., & Hare, M. (1970). Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1, Pt.1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028621.

Boydell, N., Fergie, G., McDaid, L., & Hilton, S. (2014). Avoiding Pitfalls and Realising Opportunities: Reflecting on Issues of Sampling and Recruitment for Online Focus Groups. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300109.

Bristol, T., & Fern, E. (1996). Exploring the Atmosphere Created in Focus Group Interviews: Comparing Consumers’ Attitudes Across Qualitative Techniques. Journal of the Market Research Society, 38, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539603800208.

Burton, L., & Goldsmith, D. (2002, June 4). A Presentation for the Association for Institutional Research: The Medium is the Message: Using Online Focus Groups to Study Online Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Calder, B. (1977). Focus groups and the nature of qualitative marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 353–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400311.

Catterall, M., & Maclaran, P. (1997). Focus group data and qualitative analysis programs: Coding the moving picture as well as the snapshots. Sociological Research Online, 2(1), xxi–xxii. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.67.

Clark, A. M. (2016). Why qualitative research needs more and better systematic review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1) https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916672741.

Corrao, S. (2000). Il Focus Group. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Cortini, M. (2001). Silence as a tool for the negotiation of sense in multiparties conversation. In E. Weigand, M. Dascal (Eds.), Negotiation and power in dialogic interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.214.14cor.

Cortini, M., & Tria, S. (2014). Triangulating qualitative and quantitative approaches for the analysis of textual materials: An introduction to T-lab. Social Science Computer Review, 32(4), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313510108.

Currie, D. H., & Kelly, D. M. (2012). Group interviews: Understanding shared meaning and meaning-making. In Delamont, S., & Jones, A. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 405–414).

Davis, J. H., & Hinsz, V. B. (1982). Current research in group performance and group dynamics. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreischgaver (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. I–20). London: Academic Press.

Dawson, S., Manderson, L., & Tallo, V. L. (1993). A manual for the use of Focus Group. Boston, MA: International Nutrition Foundation for Developing Countries.

De Grada, E. (2000). Fondamenti di psicologia dei gruppi. Roma: Carocci Editore.

Desportes, J. P., & Lemaine, J. M. (1988). The sizes of human groups: An analysis of their distributions. In D. Canter, J. C. Jesuino, L. Soczka, & G. M. Stephenson (Eds.), Environmental social psychology (pp. 57–65). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2802-2_5.

Duarte, A., Veloso, L., Marques, J., & Sebastião, J. (2015). Site-specific focus groups: Analysing learning spaces in situ. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.910743.

Eisikovits, Z., & Koren, C. (2010). Approaches to and Outcomes of Dyadic Interview Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1642–1655 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310376520.

Farquhar, C., & Das, R. (1999). Are focus groups suitable for ‘sensitive’ topics? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, pp. 47–63. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857.n4.

Fern, E. F. (1982). The Use of Focus Group for Idea Generation: the Effects of Group Size, Acquaintanceships and Moderation on Response Quantity and Quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900101.

Galloway, K. L. (2011). Focus groups in the virtual world: Implications for the future of evaluation. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Really new directions in evaluation: Young evaluators’ perspectives. New Directions for Evaluation, 131, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.377.

Gibbs, A. (2012). Focus Groups and Group Interviews. In Arthur, J., Waring, M., Coe, R., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.), Research, methods and methodologies in education (pp. 186–191). London: Sage.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Graffigna, G., & Bosio, A. C. (2006). The influence of setting on findings produced in qualitative health research: A comparison between face-to-face and online discussion groups about HIV/AIDS. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500307.

Grandclément, C., & Gaglio, G. (2011). Convoking the consumer in person: The focus group effect. In Zwick, D., & Cayla, J. (Edts.), Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices (pp. 87–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576746.003.0005.

Greenbaum, T. L. (1998). The handbook for focus group research. London, UK: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986151.

Guest, G., Namey, E., Taylor, J., Eley, N., & McKenna, K. (2017). Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: Findings from a randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601.

Hancock, M. E., Amankwaa, L., Revell, M. A., & Mueller, D. (2016). Focus group data saturation: A new approach to data analysis. Qualitative Report, 21(11), 2124–2130.

Hartman, J. (2004). Using focus groups to conduct business communication research. Journal of Business Communication, 41(4), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943604267775.

Hoppe, M. J., Wells, E. A., Morrison, D. M., Gillmore, M. R., & Wilsdon, A. (1995). Using focus groups to discuss sensitive topics with children. Evaluation Review, 19(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X950190010.

Hwang, S. (2008). Utilizing Qualitative Data Analysis Software A Review of Atlas.ti. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307312485.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., & Plantin, C. (1995). Le trilogue. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.

Korde, R., & Paulus, P. B., Alternating individual and group idea generation: Finding the elusive synergy, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.002.

Kravitz, D. A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 936–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.936.

Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lankton, N. K., McKnight, H., & Tripp, J. (2008). Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(10), 880–918. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00411.

Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822.

Mariampolski, H. (1989). Probing correctly uncovers truth behind answers in focus group. Marketing News, 22, 22–26.

Medina Maldonado, V. E., Torres Torres, L. M., & Navarro de Sáez, M. J. (2013). Focus group discussion as tool to study gender relations in urban community members. Enfermeria Global, 12(1), 450–462.

Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773.

Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1086/209566.

Morgan, D. L. (1993). Successful Focus Group. Advancing the State of the Art. Sage Focus edition. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349008.

Morgan, D. L., Ataie, J., Carder, P., & Hoffman, K. (2013). Introducing Dyadic Interviews as a Method for Collecting Qualitative Data. Qualitative Health Research, 23(9), 1276–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313501889.

Morgan, D. L. and Hoffman, K. (2018) A System for Coding the Interaction in Focus Groups and Dyadic Interviews. The Qualitative Report, 23(3), 519–531.

Murgado-Armenteros, E. M., Torres-Ruiz, F. J., & Vega-Zamora, M. (2012). Differences between Online and Face to Face Focus Groups,Viewed through Two Approaches. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000200008.

Nakamura, M. (2003). Group Size in Gaming Simulation: What can we learn from the literature on psychological experiments and gaming simulations? In Arai. K. (ed.). Social Contributions and Responsibilities of Simulation & Gaming. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the International Simulation And Gaming Association (ISAGA), pp. 497–506.

Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 186–213. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1.

Ohtsubo, Y., & Masuchi, A. (2004). Effects of Status Difference and Group Size in Group Decision Making. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204043723.

Palumbo, M. & Garbarino, E. (2006). Ricerca sociale: metodo e tecniche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209168.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010.

Stagi, L. (2000). Il focus group come tecnica di valutazione. Pregi, difetti, potenzialità. Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione, 20, 67–88.

Stasser, G. (1992). Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 156–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90049-D.

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.

Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2006). Focus groups: theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412991841.

Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2017). Online focus groups. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288.

Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056916.

Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., Hausknecht, D. R., Dallin, R. F., & Johnson, L. W. (1997). Collecting information from groups: A comparison of two methods. Journal of theMarket Research Society, 39(2), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539703900205.

Tadajewski, M. (2016). Focus groups: History, epistemology and non-individualistic consumer research. Consumption Markets and Culture, 19(4), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1104038.

Trobia, A. (2005). La ricerca sociale quali – quantitativa. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Proulx, C. M., & Pasley, K. (2008). A comparison of internet andface-to-face (FTF) qualitative methods in studying the relationships of gay men. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 4(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504280802096856.

Verrocchio, M. C., Cortini, M., & Marchetti, D. (2012). Assessing child sexual abuse allegations: An exploratory study on psychological reports. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.2.175.

Waterton, C., & Wynne, B. (1998). Can focus groups access community views? In R. Barbour, & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice (pp. 127–143). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857.n9.

Woodyatt, C. R., Finneran, C. A., & Stephenson, R. (2015). In-person versus online focus group discussions: A comparative analysis of data quality. Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316631510.




DOI: 10.6092/issn.1825-8670/9603

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Michela Cortini, Teresa Galanti, Stefania Fantinelli

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.