Good Education in an Age of Measurement: On the Need to Reconnect With the Question of Purpose in Education

Authors

  • Gert Biesta Maynooth University (Ireland), University of Edinburgh (UK) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8530-7105

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/16834

Keywords:

Good education, Evaluation, Accountability, Aims of education, Evidence-based

Abstract

In this paper I argue that there is a need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education, particularly in the light of a recent tendency to focus discussions about education almost exclusively on the measurement and comparison of educational outcomes. I first discuss why the question of purpose should always have a place in our educational discussion. I then explore some reasons why this question seems to have disappeared from the educational agenda. The central part of the paper is a proposal for addressing the question of purpose in education—the question as to what constitutes good education—in a systematic manner. I argue that the question of purpose is a composite question and that in deliberating about the purpose of education we should make a distinction between three functions of education to which I refer as qualification, socialisation and subjectification. In the final section of the paper I provide examples of how this proposal can help in asking more precise questions about the purpose and direction of educational processes and practices.

References

Allen, J. (2003). Daring to think otherwise? Educational policymaking in the Scottish Parliament. Journal of Education Policy, 18(3), 289–301.

Apple, M. W. (1993). Official Knowledge. Democratic Education in a Conservative Age. London/New York: Routledge.

Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2001). How difficult should education be? Educational Theory, 51(4), 385–400.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2004a). Education, accountability and the ethical demand. Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory, 54(3), 233–250.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2004b). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 23, 70–82.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2005). George Herbert Mead and the theory of schooling. In D. Troehler, & J. Oelkers (Eds.), Pragmatism and Education (pp. 117–132). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2006a). Beyond Learning. Democratic Education for a Human Future. Boulder: Paradigm.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2006b). What’s the point of lifelong learning if lifelong learning has no point? On the democratic deficit of policies for lifelong learning. European Educational Research Journal, 5(3–4), 169–180.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2007a). Why ‘what works’ won’t work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2007b). The education-socialisation conundrum. Or: ‘who is afraid of education?’. Utbildning och Demokrati, 16(3), 25–36.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2008a). A new ‘logic’ of emancipation: The methodology of Jacques Ranciere. Educational Theory, 60(1), 39-59.

Biesta, G. J. J. (2008b). What kind of citizen? What kind of democracy? Citizenship education and the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence. Scottish Educational Review, 40(2).

Biesta, G. J. J. (2008c). Education after the death of the subject: Levinas and the pedagogy of interruption. In Z. Leonardo (Ed.), The Handbook of Cultural Politics in Education (pp. 289-300). Rotterdam: Sense.

Biesta, G. J. J., & Lawy, R. S. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy. Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63–79.

Bogotch, I., Mirón, L., & Biesta, G. (2007). “Effective for what; effective for whom?” Two questions SESI should not ignore. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and school improvement (pp. 93–110). Dordrecht/Boston: Springer.

Dearden, R. F., Hirst, P. & Peters, R. S. (eds) (1972). Education and the Development of Reason. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

DfEE (1998). The Learning Age. A Renaissance for a New Britain. Sheffield: Department for Education and Employment.

DfEE (1999). Learning to Succeed. A New Framework for Post-16 Learning. Sheffield: Department for Education and Employment.

Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2008). The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education. London: Routledge.

Field, J. (2000). Lifelong Learning and the New Educational Order. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.

Fischman, W., DiBara, J. A., & Gardner, H. (2006). Creating good education against the odds. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 383–398.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Giroux, H. A. (1981). Ideology, Culture and the Process of Schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Granger, D. (2008). No child left behind and the spectacle of failing schools: the mythology of contemporary school reform. Educational Studies, 43(3), 206–228.

Gray, J. (2004). School effectiveness and the “other outcomes” of secondary schooling: a reassessment of three decades of British research. Improving Schools, 7(2), 185–198.

Haugsbakk, G., & Nordkvelle, Y. (2007). The rhetoric of ICT and the new language of learning. A critical analysis of the use of ICT in the curricular field. European Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 1–12.

Henry, G. T. (2002). Choosing criteria to judge program success: a values inquiry. Evaluation, 8(2), 182– 204.

Hess, F. M. (2006). Accountability without angst? Public opinion and no child left behind. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 587–610.

Hirsch, E. D. (1988). Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. New York: Vintage Books.

Hostetler, K. (2005). What is ‘good’ education research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16–21.

House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousands Oaks: SAGE.

Kerr, D. (2005). Citizenship education in England – listening to young people: new insights from the citizenship education longitudinal study. International Journal of Citizenship and Teacher Education, 1(1), 74–96.

Lawy, R. S., & Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Citizenship-as-practice: the educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 34–50.

Luyten, H., Visscher, A., & Witziers, B. (2005). School effectiveness research: from a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 249–279.

Mollenhauer, K. (1964). Erziehung und Emanzipation. Weinheim: Juventa.

Nicolaidou, M., & Ainscow, M. (2005). Understanding failing schools: perspectives from the inside. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 229–248.

Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and Education. London: Allen & Unwin.

Peters, R. S. (ed.) (1976). The Concept of Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Pirrie, A., & Lowden, K. (2004). The magic mirror: an inquiry into the purposes of education. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 515–528.

Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Ross, K. (1991). Translator’s introduction. In J. Rancière (Ed.), The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation (pp. 7–23). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Rutter, M., & Maughan, B. (2002). School effectiveness findings 1979–2002. Journal of School Psychology, 40(6), 451–475.

Schwandt, T., & Dahler-Larsen, P. (2006). When evaluation meets the ‘rough’ ground’ in communities. Evaluation, 12(4), 496–505.

Scottish Executive (2004). A Curriculum for Excellence. The Curriculum Review Group. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

Siegel, H. (2004). High stakes testing, educational aims and ideals, and responsible assessment. Theory and Research in Education, 2(2), 219–233.

Slavin, R. (2002). Evidence-based educational policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

Tomlinson, S. (1997). Sociological perspectives on failing schools. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 7(1), 81–98.

Townsend, T. (2001). Satan or savior? An analysis of two decades of school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(1), 115–130.

Townsend, T. (ed) (2007). International Handbook of School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Dordrecht/Boston: Springer.

Usher, R. (2006). Lyotard’s performance. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(4), 279–288.

Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (eds)(2004). Researching the Socio-political Dimensions of Mathematics Education. Dordrect: Kluwer.

Winch, C. (2005). Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking. London/New York: Routledge.

Published

2023-05-30

How to Cite

Biesta, G. (2023). Good Education in an Age of Measurement: On the Need to Reconnect With the Question of Purpose in Education. Encyclopaideia, 27(1S), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/16834