La buona educazione in un’epoca di misurazioni: sulla necessità di recuperare la questione dello scopo dell’educare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/16834Parole chiave:
Good education, Evaluation, Accountability, Aims of education, Evidence-basedAbstract
In questo articolo sostengo la necessità di riflettere sul tema dello scopo dell’educazione, soprattutto alla luce della recente tendenza a concentrare il dibattito quasi esclusivamente sulla misurazione e sul confronto dei risultati educativi. Innanzitutto, argomento perché il tema dello scopo dovrebbe sempre avere spazio nel nostro dibattito. Esploro poi alcune ragioni per cui questo tema sembra essere scomparso dall’agenda educativa. Al cuore dell’articolo v’è una proposta per affrontare questa questione in modo sistematico, ovvero l’interrogativo su cosa costituisca una buona educazione. Sostengo che la questione dello scopo è composita e che nel deliberare sullo scopo dell’educazione dovremmo fare una distinzione fra tre funzioni dell’educazione che chiamerò qualificazione, socializzazione e soggettivazione. In conclusione, porto all’attenzione due casi che mostrano come questa prospettiva possa supportare la formulazione di interrogativi più precisi sullo scopo e sulla direzione dei processi e delle pratiche educative.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Allen, J. (2003). Daring to think otherwise? Educational policymaking in the Scottish Parliament. Journal of Education Policy, 18(3), 289–301.
Apple, M. W. (1993). Official Knowledge. Democratic Education in a Conservative Age. London/New York: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2001). How difficult should education be? Educational Theory, 51(4), 385–400.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2004a). Education, accountability and the ethical demand. Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory, 54(3), 233–250.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2004b). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 23, 70–82.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2005). George Herbert Mead and the theory of schooling. In D. Troehler, & J. Oelkers (Eds.), Pragmatism and Education (pp. 117–132). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006a). Beyond Learning. Democratic Education for a Human Future. Boulder: Paradigm.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006b). What’s the point of lifelong learning if lifelong learning has no point? On the democratic deficit of policies for lifelong learning. European Educational Research Journal, 5(3–4), 169–180.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2007a). Why ‘what works’ won’t work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2007b). The education-socialisation conundrum. Or: ‘who is afraid of education?’. Utbildning och Demokrati, 16(3), 25–36.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2008a). A new ‘logic’ of emancipation: The methodology of Jacques Ranciere. Educational Theory, 60(1), 39-59.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2008b). What kind of citizen? What kind of democracy? Citizenship education and the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence. Scottish Educational Review, 40(2).
Biesta, G. J. J. (2008c). Education after the death of the subject: Levinas and the pedagogy of interruption. In Z. Leonardo (Ed.), The Handbook of Cultural Politics in Education (pp. 289-300). Rotterdam: Sense.
Biesta, G. J. J., & Lawy, R. S. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy. Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63–79.
Bogotch, I., Mirón, L., & Biesta, G. (2007). “Effective for what; effective for whom?” Two questions SESI should not ignore. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and school improvement (pp. 93–110). Dordrecht/Boston: Springer.
Dearden, R. F., Hirst, P. & Peters, R. S. (eds) (1972). Education and the Development of Reason. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
DfEE (1998). The Learning Age. A Renaissance for a New Britain. Sheffield: Department for Education and Employment.
DfEE (1999). Learning to Succeed. A New Framework for Post-16 Learning. Sheffield: Department for Education and Employment.
Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2008). The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education. London: Routledge.
Field, J. (2000). Lifelong Learning and the New Educational Order. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
Fischman, W., DiBara, J. A., & Gardner, H. (2006). Creating good education against the odds. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 383–398.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Giroux, H. A. (1981). Ideology, Culture and the Process of Schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Granger, D. (2008). No child left behind and the spectacle of failing schools: the mythology of contemporary school reform. Educational Studies, 43(3), 206–228.
Gray, J. (2004). School effectiveness and the “other outcomes” of secondary schooling: a reassessment of three decades of British research. Improving Schools, 7(2), 185–198.
Haugsbakk, G., & Nordkvelle, Y. (2007). The rhetoric of ICT and the new language of learning. A critical analysis of the use of ICT in the curricular field. European Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 1–12.
Henry, G. T. (2002). Choosing criteria to judge program success: a values inquiry. Evaluation, 8(2), 182– 204.
Hess, F. M. (2006). Accountability without angst? Public opinion and no child left behind. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 587–610.
Hirsch, E. D. (1988). Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. New York: Vintage Books.
Hostetler, K. (2005). What is ‘good’ education research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16–21.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousands Oaks: SAGE.
Kerr, D. (2005). Citizenship education in England – listening to young people: new insights from the citizenship education longitudinal study. International Journal of Citizenship and Teacher Education, 1(1), 74–96.
Lawy, R. S., & Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Citizenship-as-practice: the educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 34–50.
Luyten, H., Visscher, A., & Witziers, B. (2005). School effectiveness research: from a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 249–279.
Mollenhauer, K. (1964). Erziehung und Emanzipation. Weinheim: Juventa.
Nicolaidou, M., & Ainscow, M. (2005). Understanding failing schools: perspectives from the inside. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 229–248.
Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and Education. London: Allen & Unwin.
Peters, R. S. (ed.) (1976). The Concept of Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pirrie, A., & Lowden, K. (2004). The magic mirror: an inquiry into the purposes of education. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 515–528.
Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ross, K. (1991). Translator’s introduction. In J. Rancière (Ed.), The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation (pp. 7–23). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rutter, M., & Maughan, B. (2002). School effectiveness findings 1979–2002. Journal of School Psychology, 40(6), 451–475.
Schwandt, T., & Dahler-Larsen, P. (2006). When evaluation meets the ‘rough’ ground’ in communities. Evaluation, 12(4), 496–505.
Scottish Executive (2004). A Curriculum for Excellence. The Curriculum Review Group. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
Siegel, H. (2004). High stakes testing, educational aims and ideals, and responsible assessment. Theory and Research in Education, 2(2), 219–233.
Slavin, R. (2002). Evidence-based educational policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
Tomlinson, S. (1997). Sociological perspectives on failing schools. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 7(1), 81–98.
Townsend, T. (2001). Satan or savior? An analysis of two decades of school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(1), 115–130.
Townsend, T. (ed) (2007). International Handbook of School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Dordrecht/Boston: Springer.
Usher, R. (2006). Lyotard’s performance. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(4), 279–288.
Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (eds)(2004). Researching the Socio-political Dimensions of Mathematics Education. Dordrect: Kluwer.
Winch, C. (2005). Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking. London/New York: Routledge.
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 Gert Biesta
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
