The Haunting Question of Values in the Era of Measurement, Assessment and Evidence-Based Education: Towards a Moral Accountability of Educational Decision-Making

Authors

  • Letizia Caronia Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/16338

Keywords:

Evidence based education, Empiricism, Scientific Knowledge, decision-making, Moral Accountability

Abstract

The evidence-based turn in education reveals renewed consensus on empiricism and shared trust in science as if it were the allegedly value-free basis for decision-making: good, justifiable governance should be a non-discretional corollary of scientific knowledge. The article focuses on some risks implied in pursuing the de-moralization of educational decision-making, namely the realistic, the reductionist, and the perspective fallacies, as well as the minimization of individual responsibility in favor of the third-person perspective implied in following protocols and guidelines. In the discussion I address some possible reasons for the appeal of the evidence-based turn despite these risks: the contemporary pressure for “accountability” and the need to justify social policies and practices with consensual criteria. In the conclusion, I claim that educational decision-making should deploy rather than conceal its moral bases despite their being potentially highly divisive. Consequently, I make a case for “moral accountability”: making publicly inspectable what evidence-based education tries to conceal, i.e. the unavoidable value-ladeness of educational policies and practices.

References

Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Vicking Press.

Arendt, H. (2003). Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship. In Ead., Responsibility and Judgment (J. Kohen, Ed.) (pp. 18–48). New York: Schocken Books. (Original work published 1964).

Bertolini, P. (1988). L’esistere pedagogico. Ragioni e limiti di una pedagogia come scienza fenomenologicamente fondata. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Bertolini, P. (1999a). Sulla didattica [On Didactics]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Bertolini, P. (1999b). La valutazione possibile [The Possible Assessment]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Biesta, G. (2004). Education, accountability and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained?. Educational Theory, 54(3), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-2004.2004.00017.x

Biesta, G. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x

Boselli, G. (1998). Postprogrammazione [Postplanning] (2nd ed.). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Caronia, L. (2018). Le scienze come pratiche morali [Sciences as moral practices]. In S. Besoli & L. Caronia (Eds.), Il senso e la realtà. L’orizzonte della fenomenologia nello studio del mondo sociale [Sense and Reality. The Phenomenological Horizon in the Study of Social World] (pp. 25–69). Macerata: Quodlibet.

Caronia, L. (2021). Language, Interaction and Culture. An Introduction. In L. Caronia (Ed.), Language and Interaction at Home and School (pp. 1–36). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Caronia, L. (2022a). The evidence-based cargo-cult and the de-moralization of (educational) decision-making: A critical reflection. Paideutika, 18(35), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.57609/paideutika.vi35.2147

Caronia, L. (2022b). Se “il linguaggio non è mai neutro”: i valori inscritti nelle pratiche al tempo dell’accountability in educazione [What if Language Was never Neutral? The Value-Embeddedness of Practices in the Era of Accountability]. Rassegna di Pedagogia, LXXX(3/4), 234–255. http://digital.casalini.it/10.19272/202202104002

Caronia, L., & Caron, A. H. (2019). Morality in Scientific Practice: The Relevance and Risks of Situated Scientific Knowledge in Application-Oriented Social Research. Human Studies, 42(3), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-018-09491-2

Carrier, M. (2013). Values and objectivity in science: Value-ladenness, pluralism and the epistemic attitude. Science & Education, 22, 2547–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9481-5

Cochrane, A. L. (1972). Effectiveness and Efficiency. Random Reflections of Health Services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.

Cohen, A. M., Stavri, P. Z., & Hersh, W. R. (2004). A categorization and analysis of the criticisms of evidence-based medicine. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.11.002

Colicchi, E. (2021). I valori in educazione e in pedagogia [Values in Education and Pedagogy]. Roma: Carocci.

De Monticelli, R. (2021). Towards a Phenomenological Axiology. Discovering What Matters. London: Palgrave McMillan.

Derrida, J. (1988). Limited inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Douglas, H. (2007). Rejecting the ideal of value-free science. In H. Kincaid, J. Dupré, & A. Wylie (Eds.), Value-free Science? Ideals and Illusions (pp. 120–141). New York: Oxford University Press.

Douglas, H. (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992). Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 268(17), 2420–2425. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032

Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403259491

Longino, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Longino, H. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ochs, E. (2002). Becoming a speaker of culture. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives (pp. 99–120). London-New York: Continuum Press.

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2008). Language Socialization: An Historical Overview. In N. H. Hornberger & P. A. Duff (Eds.), Language Socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education Volume 8 (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–15). New-York: Springer.

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2012). The Theory of Language Socialization. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 1–22). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice Hall.

Pickering, A. (1992). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rommetveit, R. (1976). On the Architecture of Intersubjectivity. In L. H. Strickland, K. J. Gergen, & F. J. Aboud (Eds.), Social Psychology in Transition (pp.163–75). New York: Plenum Press.

Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015

Slavin, R. E. (2004). Educational Research can and must Address “What Works” Questions. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 27–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033001027

Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wright Mills, C. (1940). Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motives. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904–913.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-30

How to Cite

Caronia, L. (2023). The Haunting Question of Values in the Era of Measurement, Assessment and Evidence-Based Education: Towards a Moral Accountability of Educational Decision-Making. Encyclopaideia, 27(1S), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/16338