La noia nei contesti educativi: una revisione critica

Autori

  • Tom Feldges Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Institut für Erziehungswissenschaften http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2113-326X
  • Sonia Pieczenko Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/11035

Parole chiave:

Noia educativa, Classificazione, Husserl, Fenomenologia, Neuroscienze

Abstract

Mentre argomentiamo l'ambiguità del concetto di noia, discutiamo di un approccio psicologico, neuroscientifico e fenomenologico alla noia nei contesti educativi. Analizzando queste diverse prospettive con l'aiuto di una tassonomia recentemente sviluppata di quattro diversi tipi di noia, sosteniamo che la classificazione confonde stati antecedenti e conseguenti con la noia effettiva. Sebbene tali classificazioni possano ancora essere utili a scopi pratici, sosteniamo che gli approcci che sono principalmente guidati dallo scopo di controllare ed evitare la noia non consentono una messa in discussione del potenziale ruolo che la noia svolge nell'educazione e non soddisfano l’esigenza di una riflessione critica sugli aspetti tradizionali della relazione educativa.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2012). The Brain’s Default Network and its Adaptive Role in Internal Mentation. Neuroscientist, 18(3), 251-270.

Bench, S. W., & Lench, H. C. (2013). On the function of boredom. Behavioural Sciences, 3(3), 459-472.

Bollnow, O. F. (1956). Das Wesen der Stimmungen. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

Buck, G. (2019). Lernen und Erfahrung. Epagogik. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Daschmann, E. (2013). Boredom in School from the Perspective of Students, Teachers and Parent. Retrieved April 29, 2020 from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-240080.

Danckert, J., & Merrifield, C. (2018). Boredom, sustained attention and the default mode network. Experimental Brain Research, 236, 2507-2518.

Elpidorou, A. (2017). The bored mind is a guiding mind: towards a regulatory theory of boredom. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17, 455-484.

Evans, D., & Cruse, P. (2004). Emotion, Evolution and Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Feldges, T. (2013). Neurophenomenology – Current Problems and Historical Baggage. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(3-4), 222-229.

Feldges, T., Elton, J., & Pieczenko, S. (2017). The Art of Education or the Science of Education? Educational Futures, 8(1), 1-19.

Feldges, T. (2017). Motivation and Experience versus cognitive Psychological Explanation. Humana Mente, 11(33), 1-18.

Fenichel, O. (1953). The collected Papers of Otto Fenichel. First Series. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

Götz, T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2006). Phänomenologie schulischer Langweile. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38(4), 149-153.

Götz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2007). Regulation von Langweile im Unterricht. Was Schülerinnen und Schüler bei der ‚Windstille der Seele’ (nicht) tun. Unterichtswissenschaft, 35(4), 312-333.

Götz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2014). Academic Boredom. In R. Perkun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of Emotions in Education (pp. 311-330). London: Routledge.

Grant, S. J. (2000). Introductory Economics – 7th ed. Harlow: Longman.

Habermas, J. (1973a). Legitimitätsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1973b). Kultur und Kritik. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp.

Heidegger, M. (1993). Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

Heidegger, M. (2006). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Husserl, E. (1950). Husserliana III – Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie – Erstes Buch. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Husserl, E. (1966). Husserliana X – Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893-1917). Den Haag: Martinis Nijhoff.

Husserl, E. (1968). Husserliana IX – Phänomenologische Psychologie. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Husserl, E. (1984). Husserliana XIX/1 – Logische Untersuchungen – Zweiter Band – Erster Teil. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Johnson, B., & McElroy, T. M., (2010). The Edutrainer: Connecting the Art and Science of Teaching. Plymouth: Wowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Kant, I. (2009). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Meiner. (Original work published 1790).

Klinger, E. (2009). Daydreaming and fantasizing: Thought, flow and Motivation. In D. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental stimulation (pp. 242-240). Howe: Psychology Press.

Krebs, R. M., Schott, B. H., & Duezel, E. (2009). The novelty exploration bonus and its attentional modulation. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2272-2281.

Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540-563.

LeDoux, J. (1996). Emotional Networks in the Brain. In M. Lewis, & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 109-118). London: Guilford Press.

Lipps, T. (1903). Leitfaden der Psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.

Lloyd, P., & Mayes, A. (1990). Introduction to Psychology. Glasgow: Fontana.

London, H., Schubert, D. S., & Washburn, D., (1972). Increase of autonomic arousal in boredom. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 80(1), 29-36.

Luft, S., & Overgaard, S. (2014). The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.

Lutz, A. (2007). Meditation and the Neuroscience of Consciousness: An Introduction. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thomson (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness (pp. 499–555). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marion, J. L. (1998). Reduction and Givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger and Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Nagel, T. (1979). What is it like to be a bat? In T. Nagel (Ed.), Mortal Questions (pp. 165-180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pattison, G. (2013). Kierkegaard and the Quest for Unambiguous Life: Between Romanticism and Modernism: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.

Pekrun, R., Götz, T., Daniels, L.M., Stupnisky, R.H., & Perry, P.P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedence and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(3), 531-549.

Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2015). International Handbook of Emotions in Education. Abingdon: Routledge.

Prinz, J. (2004). Gut reactions: A perceptual theory of emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raffaelli, Q., Mills, C., & Christoff, K. (2018). The knowns and unknowns of boredom: a review of the literature. Experimental Brain Research, 236, 2451-2462.

Robinson, W. P. (1975). Boredom at school. Educational Psychology, 45(2), 141-152.

Ruse, M. (2005). Scientific Method. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (p. 857). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schopenhauer, A. (1977). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Zürich: Diogenes.

Sierra, M. (2009). Depersonalization – A new look at a neglected Syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery and consciousness (Vol. 1: The positive affects). New York, NY: Springer.

Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 569-595.

Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Achievement Motivation. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved April 29, 2020 from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0008.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Zahavi, D. (2008). Intentionalität und Bewusstsein (V. Logische Untersuchung, §§ 1-21, Beilage der VI. Untersuchung). In V. Mayer (Ed.), Logische Untersuchungen (pp. 139-157). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Pubblicato

2020-08-26

Come citare

Feldges, T., & Pieczenko, S. (2020). La noia nei contesti educativi: una revisione critica. Encyclopaideia, 24(57), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/11035

Fascicolo

Sezione

Saggi