Genitori oltre la crisi. Verso una scuola come spazio condiviso e un mondo “più che umano”

Autori

  • Maria Mendel University of Gdansk https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-5402

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/14586

Parole chiave:

genitori, crisi, scuola sostenibile di comunità, mondo più che umano, pedagia dello spazio vitale

Abstract

Questo articolo costituisce un tentativo di descrivere le attività dei genitori in cui ciò che sorprende — sulla base di una valutazione negativa della realtà esistente (dalle crisi in atto alla privatizzazione dei servizi pubblici) — è il fatto che i genitori sembrano intensificare la loro ricerca di nuove soluzioni che riescano a rendere migliore non solo la scuola ma anche il mondo di cui quest’ultima è parte. Il focus delle loro attività è la dimensione locale in cui centrale diviene la sostenibilità e i luoghi sono enfatizzati. Nell’approccio qui adottato, il luogo è un campo di confronto e in constante divenire. Le iniziative genitoriali portate avanti in una scuola di comunità sostenibile a Chicago costituiscono il punto di partenza per introdurre la pedagogia del luogo vitale. Quest’ultima presta particolare attenzione ai modi attraverso i quali l’eredità di questi luoghi li rende (almeno parzialmente) resistenti alla conquista capitalista e, in qualche modo, pronti a raccogliere le sfide generate dalle crisi che interessano oggi il pianeta. La riflessione qui presentata si radica nella convinzione che in questi tempi, quando è in gioco la sopravvivenza dell’umanità, abbiamo un disperato bisogno di un modello di mondo più-che-umano.  

Riferimenti bibliografici

Abram, D. (1997). The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. New York: Vintage.

Borg, C. (2021). When professionals listen: parents as co-producers of knowledge. International Journal on Pedagogy, Innovation and New Technologies, 7(1), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.4465

Bowers, C.A. (2008). Why a critical pedagogy of place is an oxymoron. Environmental Education Research, 14 (3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F13504620802156470

Buras, K.L. (2015). Charter schools, race, and urban space: where the market meets grassroots resistance. New York: Routledge.

Calderon, D. (2014). Speaking back to Manifest Destinies: a land education-based approach to critical curriculum inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 20 (1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F13504622.2013.865114

McCoy, K. (2014). Manifesting Destiny: a land education analysis of settler colonialism in Jamestown, Virginia, USA. Environmental Education Research, 20 (1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F13504622.2013.865116

Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge–Malden: Polity Press.

Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge–Malden: Polity Press.

Burawoy, M. (2021). Decolonizing Sociology: The Significance of W.E.B. Du Bois. Critical Sociology, 47(4-5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205211005180

Coval, K. (2014). Rahm Emanuel's Chicago, a Tale of Two Cities, CNN April 3. Retrieved April 4, 2017 from https://www.cnn.com/2014/04/02/opinion/coval-chicagoland-rahmemanuel/

Crozier, G. (1999). Parental involvement: Who wants it? International Studies in Sociology of Education,_ 9_(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620219900200045

Crozier, G. (2000). Parents and Schools: Partners or Protagonists? Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books – Stylus Publishing.

Dahlstedt, M. (2009). Parental governmentality: involving ‘immigrant parents’ in Swedish schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690802700289

Davies, D., Burch, P., & Johnson, V.R. (1992). Policies to increase family–community involvement. Equity and Choice, 1992(8/3), 48–51.

Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. (P. Kamuf, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

Dolphijn, R., & Tuin van der, I. (2012). New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. University of Michigan Library: Open Humanities Press.

Epstein, J.L. (1995). School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring for the Children We Share. Phi Delta Kappan, 1995, (76/9), 701–712.

Ferlazzo, L. (2011). Involvement or Engagement? Educational Leadership, 68(8), 10–14.

Gold, E., Simon, E., & Brown, C. (2002). Strong Neighborhoods, Strong Schools. The Indicators Project on Education Organizing, Chicago–Philadelphia: Cross City Campaign for Urban Schools, Research for Action.

Gruenewald, D. (2003). The Best of Both Worlds: A Critical Pedagogy of Place. Educational Researcher, 3(4), 3–12.

Heers, M., Klaveren, C.V., Groot, W., & Massen van den Brink, H. (2016). Community Schools. What We Know and What We Need to Know. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1016–1051. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627365

Latour, B. (2013). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.

Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.

Lipman, P. (2017). The landscape of education “reform” in Chicago: Neoliberalism meets a grassroots movement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(54), 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2660

Mendel, M. (Ed.)(2006). Pedagogika miejsca [Pedagogy of Place]. Wroclaw: Lower Silesia University Press.

Mendel, M. (2017). Pedagogika miejsca wspólnego. Miasto i szkola [Pedagogy of the Common Place: The City and The School]. Gdansk: University of Gdansk Press.

Mendel, M. (2019). The spatial ways democracy works: On the pedagogy of common places. Why, why now? Research in Education, 1(103), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523719839743

Mendel, M. (2020). Eduwidmontologia – przyczynki [Introducing edu-hauntology] In M. Mendel (Ed.), Eduwidma, rzeczy i miejsca nawiedzone [Edu-specters, things and haunted places] (pp. 10–29). Gdansk: University of Gdansk Press.

Mendel M. (2022). On the haunted ‘public’ in public education in Poland. European Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211008262

Maller, C. (2018). Healthy Urban Environments: More-than-Human Theories. London & New York: Routledge.

Rancière, J. (2011). The Thinking of Dissensus: Politics and Aesthetics. In P. Bowman, R. Stamp (Eds.), Reading Rancièr, (pp. 1–17). London & New York: Continuum.

Rosanvallon, P. (2013). The Society of Equals. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.

Ruitenberg, C. (2005). Deconstructing the Experience of the Local: Toward a Radical Pedagogy of Place. Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 212–220.

Stovall, D.O. (2016). Born Out of Struggle: Critical Race Theory, School Creation, and the Politics of Interruption. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Vincent C. (2000): Including parents? Education, citizenship and parental agency. Buckingham-Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Pubblicato

2022-08-25

Come citare

Mendel, M. (2022). Genitori oltre la crisi. Verso una scuola come spazio condiviso e un mondo “più che umano”. Encyclopaideia, 26(63), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/14586

Fascicolo

Sezione

Focus