Perché leggere Towards a Phenomenological Axiology. Discovering What Matters di Roberta De Monticelli. Appunti di una volpe che voleva diventare un riccio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/15538Parole chiave:
Phenomenology, Axiology, Roberta De Monticelli, Values, Social sciencesAbstract
Questo articolo è incentrato sull’importante e stimolante lavoro di Roberta De Monticelli (2021), Towards a Phenoenological Axiology. Discovering What Matters. L’articolo spiega i motivi per cui questo lavoro dovrebbe essere letto, soprattutto dai professionisti della cura. Benché moralità e giudizi di valore impregnino la vita quotidiana di ciascuno di noi, essi impregnano - spesso invisibilmente - anche le conoscenze esperte e le pratiche professionali di chi si occupa di cura e di educazione. Al di là delle tesi contenute nel volume, il suo contributo più significativo consiste nel rendere il lettore consapevole dell’inevitabilità della morale nel pensiero e nei gesti di ogni giorno e della necessità di un posizionamento riflessivo a riguardo. Accogliendo la metafora della polemica tra “il riccio e la volpe”, scelta da Roberta De Monticelli come cornice della sua proposta teorica, l’articolo espone quali sono i dubbi e le controargomentazioni da parte di una studiosa dell’educazione che proprio perché tale non riesce – suo malgrado – a diventare un riccio. Spiega perché la sua “visione professionale” non può non farle notare ciò che il riccio sembra trascurare, ossia l’inevitabile mediazione del linguaggio e dell’interazione sociale che precede e quindi informa la costituzione di quel che il riccio rileva in modo convincente: l’intreccio tra fatti e valori. L’articolo si conclude riflettendo sul posto (sottovalutato?) delle scienze sociali sulle posizioni in gioco in tale dibattito, la loro tensione tra normatività implicita e presunta descrittività, nonché le sfide inaugurate – ma non tematizzate – dall’attuale viraggio delle scienze sociali verso una normatività sempre più esplicita.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, Austin: Texas University Press.
Bateson, G. (1972/1977). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; trad. it. di G. Longo, Verso una ecologia della mente. Milano: Adelphi.
Becchi, E., & Julia, D. (Eds.) (1996). Storia dell’infanzia 2. Dal Settecento a oggi. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Berger, P., & Zijderveld, A. (2009/2011). In praise of doubt. New York: HarperCollins; trad. it. di G. Vintaloro, Elogio del dubbio. Bologna: il Mulino.
Bergmann, J. (1998). Introduction: Morality in discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3/4), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594
Bertolini, P. (1958). Fenomenologia e pedagogia. Bologna: Malipiero.
Bertolini, P. (1988). L’esistere pedagogico. Ragioni e limiti di una pedagogia come scienza fenomenologicamente fondata. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Bertolini, P. (2001). Pedagogia fenomenologica: genesi, sviluppo, orizzonti. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; trad. it. di E. Prodon (1992). La ricerca del significato. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; trad. it. di L. Cornalba (1997). La cultura dell’educazione. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Caronia, L. (2011). Fenomenologia dell’educazione. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Caronia, L. (2012). Chi ha paura del relativismo? Peirce, Wittgenstein, Vygotsky e le radici linguistiche della conoscenza (non della realtà). Ricerche di pedagogia e didattica/Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 7(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/3215
Caronia, L. (2018). The phenomenological turn in education: The legacy of Piero Bertolini’s theory. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica/Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 13(2), 1-22. Special Issue. Phenomenology and Education Today, L. Caronia (ed.) https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/8600
Caronia, L. 2019: Following and analyzing an artifact: Culture-through-things, in F. Cooren, F. Malbois (eds.), Methodological and Ontological Principles of Observation and Analysis (pp. 112-138). New York: Routledge.
Caronia, L. (2021). Language, interaction, and culture. An Introduction. In L. Caronia (ed.), Language and Interaction at Home and School (pp. 1-36). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Caronia, L. (2022). The evidence-based cargo-cult and the de-moralization of (educational) decision-making. Paideutika, 35, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.57609/paideutika.vi35.2147
Caronia, L. (2022, in stampa) , Se “il linguaggio non è mai neutro”: i valori inscritti nelle pratiche al tempo dell’accountability in educazione, Rassegna di Pedagogia.
Caronia, L. Besoli, S. (2018), Il canone fenomenologico e lo studio del mondo sociale. In S. Besoli & L. Caronia (eds.), Il senso e la realtà. L'orizzonte della fenomenologia nello studio del mondo sociale (pp. VII-XXXV). Macerata: Quodlibet.
Caronia, L., & Caron, A.H. (2019). Morality in Scientific Practice: The Relevance and Risks of Situated Scientific Knowledge in Application-Oriented Social Research. Human Studies, 42(3), 451-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-018-09491-2
Caronia, L., Colla, V., & Galatolo, R. (2021). Making unquestionable worlds. Morality building practices in family dinner dialogues. In L. Caronia (ed.), Language and Interaction at home and school (pp. 87-120). Amsterdam/Philadelphia/New York: John Benjamins.
Caronia, L., & Katz, J.E. (2010). Between the Subject’s Agency and the Strength of Things. An Introduction. Encyclopaideia, 15(28), 4-34.
Caronia, L., & Orletti, F. (2019). The agency of language in institutional talk: An introduction. Language and Dialogue, 9(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00029.orl
Carrier, M. (2013). Values and objectivity in science: Value-ladenness, pluralism and the epistemic attitude. Science & Education, 22, 2547-2568. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s1119 1-012-9481-5>
Carugati, F., & Selleri, P. (1996). Psicologia sociale dell’educazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Cole, M. (1996a). Culture in Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M. (1996b). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M., & Bruner, J. (1971). Cultural differences and inferences about psychological process. American Psychologist, 26, 867-876. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0032240
Colicchi, E. (2021). I valori in educazione e in pedagogia. Roma: Carocci.
Collins H.M., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11, 373-393. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1350508404041998
Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Costa, V. (2007). Il cerchio e l’ellisse. Husserl e il darsi delle cose. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Costa, V. (2015). Fenomenologia dell’educazione e della formazione. Brescia: La Scuola.
Costa, V. (2018a). Education: filling the mind or opening the existence? A phenomenological perspective. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica/ Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 13 (2), 23-34. Special Issue. Phenomenology and Education Today, L. Caronia (ed.). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/8592
Costa, V. (2018b). Andare alle cose stesse. Mondo, cultura e mente. In S. Besoli, & L. Caronia (eds.), Il senso e la realtà. L'orizzonte della fenomenologia nello studio del mondo sociale (pp 1-24). Macerata: Quodlibet.
Cromdal, J., & Tholander, M. (2015). Morality in Practice: Exploring Childhood, Parenthood Schooling in Everyday Life. London: Equinox.
Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Perret-Clermont, A. (1976). Social Interaction and Cognitive Development: Further Evidence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6(2), 245-247. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/ejsp.2420060207
Douglas, H. (2007). Rejecting the ideal of value-free science. In H. Kincaid, J. Dupré, & A. Wylie (Eds.), Value-free science? Ideals and illusions (120–141). NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy and the value-free ideal. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press.
Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31 (3/4), 295-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
Duranti, A. (2004). Agency in Language. In A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 451-73). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Duranti, A. (2010). Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological theory, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1463499610370517
Duranti, A., & La Mattina, N. (2022) The Semiotics of Cooperation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 11-45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041420-103556
Duranti, A., Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B.B. (2012). The Handbook of Language Socialization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Emiliani, F., Carugati F. (1986). Il mondo sociale dei bambini. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Erikson, F. & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008021
Fabbri, M. (2005). Nel cuore della scelta. Kierkegaard, l'etica senza fondamenti e l'angoscia della formazione. Milano: Unicopli.
Galatolo, R., & Caronia, L. (2018). Morality at dinnertime: the sense of the other as a practical accomplishment in family interaction. Discourse & Society, 29(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0957926517726110
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H., & Liberman, K. (2007). Introduction: the Lebenswelt origins of the sciences. Human Studies, 30(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9045-x
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw, J. Bransford (eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Givòn, T. (1989). Mind, Code and Context, Essays in Pragmatics. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
Gurvitch, G. (1937). La théorie des valeurs de Heinrich Rickert. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger, 124, 9/10, 80-88.
Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic dependence. The Journal of philosophy, 82(7), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026523
Harré, R. (2002). Material Objects in Social Worlds. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(5/6), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F026327640201900502.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk. Analsying data. In D. Silvermann (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 222-245). London: Sage.
Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative inquiry, 10(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403259491
Husserl, E. (1935/1961). Die Krisis des Europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie. Wien, Biblioteca Augustana; trad. it. di E. Filippini, in Id., La crisi delle scienze europee e la fenomenologia trascendentale (pp. 309-33). Milano: il Saggiatore.
Husserl, E. (1954/1961), Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. ed. by W. Biemel, Husserliana Bd. VI, Den Haag, Nijhoff; trad. it. di E. Filippini, La crisi delle scienze europee e la fenomenologia trascendentale. Milano: il Saggiatore.
Iori, V. (1996). Lo spazio vissuto: luoghi educativi e soggettività. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Iori, V. (2016). Lo studioso che ha dato vita e respiro alla pedagogia fenomenologica in Italia: Piero Bertolini. Encyclopaideia, 20(45), 18-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/6334
Jayyusi, L. (1991). Values and moral judgment: communicative praxis as moral order. In G. Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp.227-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Köhler, W. (1938/1976). The Place of Values in a World of Facts. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation,
Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3 (4), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Linell, P., & Rommetveit, R. (1998). The many forms and facets of morality in dialogue: Epilogue for the special issue. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 31(3-4), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683600
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Longino, H. E. (1996). Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy. In H. N. Lynn & N. Jack (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science (pp.39–58). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. A. (1992). Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. A. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual review of anthropology, 26, 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.291
Mantovani, G. (1998). L’elefante invisibile. Firenze: Giunti.
Mascolo, M. F. (2016). Beyond Subjectivity and Objectivity: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Science. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9357-3
Mascolo, M. F. (2017). How objectivity undermines the study of personhood: Toward an intersubjective epistemology for psychological science. New Ideas in Psychology, 44, 41-48. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.11.005
Mithun, M. (2004). The Value of Linguistic Diversity. Viewing Other Worlds through North American Indian Languages. In A. Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 121-140). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Munari, A. (1993). Il sapere ritrovato. Conoscenza, apprendimento, formazione. Milano: Guerini.
Natanson, M. (ed.) (1973). Phenomenology and the social sciences. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Olson, D. R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for “what works”: A response to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 24-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033001024
Origgi, G. (2004). Is trust an epistemological notion?. Episteme, 1(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2004.1.1.61
Origgi, G. (2005). What does it mean to trust in epistemic authority?. In 7th Annual Roundtable of Philosophy of Social Science (pp. 1-26). New York: Barnard College, Columbia University.
Origgi, G. (2014). Epistemic trust. In Capet, P. & Delavallade T. (eds.), Information Evaluation (pp. 35-54). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press.
Pickering, A. (Ed.) (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pontecorvo, C. & Duranti, A. (1996). Bambini e genitori in famiglia. Conversazione e socializzazione. Età Evolutiva 55, 53-119.
Ochs, E., & Izquierdo, C. (2009). Responsibility in childhood: Three developmental trajectories. Ethnos 37(4), 391-413.
Ochs, E., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2007). Introduction: Morality as a Family Practice. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069451
Pollner, M. (1974). Mundane reasoning. Philosophy of the social sciences, 4(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F004839317400400103
Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Potok, C. (1972). My Name is Asher Lev. New York: Anchor Books.
Potok, C. (1990). The Gift of Asher Lev. New York: Ballantine.
Rogoff, B. (1981). Adults and peers as agents of socialization: A highland Guatemalan profile. Ethos, 9(1), 18-36. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1525/eth.1981.9.1.02a00030
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B., & Lave, J.E. (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rogoff, B., Sellers, M.J., Pirrotta, S., Fox, N., & White, S.H. (1975). Age of assignment of roles and responsibilities to children. Human Development, 18(5), 353-369. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1159/000271496.]{.underline}
Rommetveit, R. (1974). On Message Structure. A Framework for the Study of Language and Communication. London – New York: John Wiley.
Rommetveit, R. (1976). On the Architecture of Intersubjectivity. In Strickland, L.H., Aboud, F.E., & Gergen, K.J. (eds), Social Psychology in Transition (pp. 93-197). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8765-1_16
Rommetveit, R. (1978). On Piagetian cognitive operations, semantic competence and message structure in adult-child communication. In I. Markova (Ed.), The social context of language (pp. 113-150). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Rommetveit, R. (1998). Intersubjective attunement and linguistically mediated meaning in discourse. In Bråten S. (ed.), Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny (pp. 354-371). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schieffelin, B.B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language Socialization Across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwab, A.P. (2008). Epistemic trust, epistemic responsibility, and medical practice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33(4), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhn013
Schweder, R.A. (1991). Thinking Through Cultures: Expeditions in Cultural Psychology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schweder, R., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1-82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Slavin, R.E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational researcher, 31(7), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015
Slavin, R.E. (2004). Educational research can and must address “what works” questions. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 27-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033001027
Slob, M., & Staman, J. (2012). Policy and the evidence beast. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut Publications.
Snow, C. (1987). Language and the beginnings of moral understanding. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 112-122). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Spinicci, P. (2000). Il mondo della vita e il problema della certezza. Lezioni su Husserl e Wittgenstein. Milano: CUEM.
Sterponi, L. A. (2003). Account episodes in family discourse: The making of morality in everyday interaction. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010401
Sterponi, L. (2009). Accountability in family discourse. Socialization into norms and standards and negotiation of responsibility in Italian dinner conversation. Childhood, 16(4), 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568209343269
Sterponi, L. (2014). Caught red-handed: How Italian parents engage children in moral discourse and action. In C. Wainryb & H. Recchia (Eds.), Talking about Right and Wrong: Parent-Child Conversations as Contexts for Moral Development (pp. 122-142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stigler, J.W., Schweder, R.A., Herdt, G.H. (eds.) (1990) Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strassheim, H., & Kettunen, P. (2014). When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence? Configurations, contexts and mechanisms. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10(2), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426514X13990433991320
Throop, C.J. (2018). Being open to the world. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 8(1-2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1086/698271
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wainryb, C., & Recchia, H. E. (2014). Parent-child conversations as contexts for moral development: why conversations, and why conversations with parents? In C. Wainryb, H.E. Recchia (eds.), Talking about Right and Wrong: Parent-Child Conversations as Contexts for Moral Development (pp. 3-20). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.
Wainryb, C., & Recchia, H. (2017). Mother-child conversations about children's moral wrongdoing: A constructivist perspective on moral socialization. In N. Budwig, E. Turiel, & P. D. Zelazo (Eds.), New perspectives on human development (pp. 182-208). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the Mind. Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wootton, A. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. G.E.M. Anscombe & G.H. von Wright (Eds.). Trans. by D. Paul & G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wright Mills, C. (1940). Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motives. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904-913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2022 Letizia Caronia
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
